[simpits-tech] Back!

[Matt Bailey]

Yeah perhaps, although I suppose it would vary a lot between (for instance) 
very old twin jets (like a Phantom) compared to simpler single-engine jets 
(like a CT-114). I was thinking the small "low performance" planes like the 
jet trainers. Yes an F-5 would be quite a nice ride. :) I still want an F-104 
though.......muwhahahaha. :)

	-Matt Bailey

On Sunday 27 July 2003 09:55 am, you wrote:
> I think those fun hot rods cost much more to actually operate and require
> much more maintenance time. Of course my dream is to have an F-5. They are
> faster than a F-18 with lower maintenance requirements. And in aggressors
> paint they look so cool:)
>
> My family is from Enid Oklahoma and my grandma's house is under Vance's
> flight pattern. You can easily tell from the sound if it is a Tweet or not.
> Justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------
>
>
> I'd like to have something like a T-37, CT-114, etc. Seems like it would be
> a fun little plane to joyride around in, and much faster than a "normal"
> general aviation piston plane, for going places. Too pricey to afford any
> time in the near future though. :( It does puzzle me to some extent, to see
> people who buy these fancy new general aviation planes, like the new
> Pipers, that cost several hundred thousand dollars, when for similar money
> or less they could have a fun hotrod like an ex-military jet or a nice
> kitbuilt plane like the RVs. Different needs I guess......I'd just want to
> fly crazy and have fun. :)
>
> So exactly what kind of flying did you do?
>
> -Matt Bailey
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software