[GEM Development] version of opengem for easy use for windowsusers

[Lyrical Nanoha]

On Wed, 10 May 2006, veganalex wrote:

> hi,
>
> does the fact that as Gem is GPL, mean that I should have to compile
> from the opengem source, and also compile the dosbox source, and then
> give instructions to compile them - for the final package? help! -
> this will take alot more work than i anticipated...and more learning.
> But i am still up for the challenge. If i just have a package of the
> dosbox source and the opengem source available to download from the
> website that will start...sometime soon, is this still inside the
> rules of the GPL licence, aslong as I give instructions for how to put
> it together, and what to get rid of once compiled?

Basically means you have to provide the sources along with the binaries, 
either in the same package, or a package in the same place as the binary 
package.

-uso.