[GEM Development] version of opengem for easy use for windows users

[Shane M. Coughlan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

rob at midworld.co.uk wrote:
> If this is indeed the case and future OpenGEM stuff is going to be
> branded thus, I would appreciate it if you would remove the TurboGEM
> bindings from your SDK; I don't really want to associate it with any
> group of which I am not an active member; distributing it under a
> "brand" would certainly imply something along these lines, and I am not
> entirely happy with this.

Hi Rob

I thought the TurboGEM bindings were released under a free license?

Certainly I have no intention of attempting to close any aspect of the
code.  I could not even if I wished to, as it is all GPL.  I am forming
a company for consultancy, and OpenGEM will be a legacy project on the
company server.  The releases - as always - are GPL licensed.

In other words, I am continuing to release a distribution of FreeGEM
code called OpenGEM.

Shane

- --
Shane Martin Coughlan
e: shane at shaneland.co.uk
m: +447773180107
w: www.shaneland.co.uk
- ---
Projects:
http://mobility.opendawn.com	http://gem.opendawn.com
http://enigmail.mozdev.org	http://www.winpt.org
- ---
Organisations:
http://www.fsfeurope.org	http://www.fsf.org
http://www.labour.org.uk	http://www.opensourceacademy.gov.uk
- ---
OpenPGP: http://www.shaneland.co.uk/personalpages/shane/files/publickey.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-svn4127: (MingW32)

iQCVAwUBRF/DI9wG3M95JPpzAQg37QP+MpsuPGea/xm24zfsPXljQlQeh9YIl0m5
uwBNLuh54W996T76vs5TQonPaBJS65XI7VRdDiN15qT6hJkvuUY13W2ntuNu3R0l
DphMlYKe5++S/KsItVp2kzsElrFlXEWQCDsDuPZxxy5tzqOCy1RuNqLPPaLAF7Kl
XDRuDAHbWEo=
=Eeua
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----