[GEM Development] Did the LIST get this REPLY? [WAS: Re: Current status and future? and wiki's database lock]

[Thomas Clayton]

I spoke too soon! 
...
but my "Sent-box" copy did have Jose's address in the "TO:" line NOT the list-server's.

Oh well, it worked and that's what matters.

Embarrassed,

Thomas Clayton
 


--- On Thu, 10/2/08, Thomas Clayton <topcatdrc at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Clayton <topcatdrc at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [GEM Development] Did the LIST get this REPLY? [WAS: Re: Current status and future? and wiki's database lock]
> To: gem-dev at simpits.org, jem at archivalladolid.org
> Date: Thursday, October 2, 2008, 12:23 AM
> I just sent a reply to Jose AND all of you
>  but 'hitting' the REPLY button didn't get 
> gem-dev at simpits.org
> put into the "To:" line! Hmmm.
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 10/1/08, José Emilio Mori Recio
> <joemmore at archivalladolid.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: José Emilio Mori Recio
> <joemmore at archivalladolid.org>
> > Subject: [GEM Development] Current status and future?
> and wiki's database lock
> > To: gem-dev at simpits.org
> > Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 6:58 PM
> > Hi again. I'm glad to see all the answers after my
> > message, and the wiki2
> > back working. Thank you all.
> > 
> > So, I'll wait until the end of the year for news
> on
> > OpenGEM 7 and the update
> > of Shane's site and its documentation and code.
> > Meanwhile, I think a more
> > updated (currently, no updates for more than a year),
> > comprehensive and
> > complete wiki, and an updated and extended FAQ about
> > GEM/OpenGEM/FreeGEM
> > shared by all the GEM sites (at least, the ones whose
> > maintainers are
> > subscribed here; almost all, I hope) could be very
> useful
> > to get more people
> > involved in the project.
> > 
> > I have tried to begin that task, but when trying to
> create
> > an account at the
> > wiki2, the answer was "the database is currently
> > locked..." because "This is
> > the read-only mirror site; to edit pages, please use
> the
> > primary mirror on
> > wiki.freegem.net..." but the primary mirror
> won't
> > work, so I'm stuck there.
> > Anyone can fix that?
> > 
> > I have also read and visited the G-GUI project, which
> is
> > interesting, but
> > I'm afraid it means more splitting of the
> efforts... I
> > don't think there is
> > "market" for a lot of graphic environments
> over
> > DOS, and I think GEM should
> > be the one to support because of its history and
> programs
> > already available.
> > If there isn't much going on in enhancements, as
> Owen
> > said, I think it would
> > be important to coordinate and join our efforts to get
> more
> > (or some)
> > results. OK, I know open source means freedom for
> everyone,
> > but maintaining
> > several compiting graphic environments or GEM
> > distributions/projects would
> > mean confusing people, which would have to read about
> all
> > of them in order
> > to choose; and they could easily forget about it if
> they
> > have to spend that
> > extra time, as using (or developing) GEM is usually a
> > hobby, and we all know
> > here that free time for hobbies is rare in these
> days...
> > 
> > Anyway, it's only my thinking, time will tell.
> I'll
> > keep on watching this
> > list's news.
> > 
> > //     José Emilio Mori Recio -
> http://www.gui.uva.es/~jem
> >         \\
> > || Administrador Informático, Arzobispado de
> Valladolid y
> > Archivo  ||
> > \\ Miembro 088 del Grupo Universitario de
> > Informática, Valladolid  //    
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gem-dev mailing list
> > gem-dev at simpits.org
> > http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gem-dev mailing list
> gem-dev at simpits.org
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev