[simpits-tech] Software reports

[Gene Buckle]

> I see - good points.  Well, all I can add is that the F-15 is supposed to be
> included in Falcon V as an accurately modeled aircraft - aside from the
> Viper, so there's still hope for the extra faucet crowd. ;-)
>
Hehe.  We'll see.  It would certainly be nice, but I'm not going to hold
my breath.

The I3D guys are working on an F-15C for FS9 that's pretty impressive.

g.

> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gene Buckle" <geneb at deltasoft.com>
> To: "Simulator Cockpit tech list" <simpits-tech at simpits.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [simpits-tech] Software reports
>
>
> > > Gene - there's a new F-15C cockpit that's come out for F4.  Might be
> > > nice for that aluminum toy you have in the shop.  As soon as Falcon Gold
> > > and SuperPAK 4 come out, that's going to be a hard sim to dismiss - the
> > > fidelity is pretty intense.  And if you can fly an F-15 in it......
> > >
> >
> > While it looks great graphically, it's totally wrong from both an avionics
> > and flight model perspective.  Falcon 4 was designed and built to simulate
> > one aircraft the best it could.  It really can't do any others effectively
> > without having portions re-written.  For instance, the FLCS simply can't
> > be "adjusted" to work like the CAS in the F-15.  It was built from the
> > ground up to work just like what's aboard the F-16.
> >
> > Falcon is a great simulator for the F-16, but it can't help but mangle
> > anything else.
> >
> > g.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Simpits-tech mailing list
> > Simpits-tech at simpits.org
> > http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/simpits-tech
> > To unsubscribe, please see the instructions at the bottom of the above
> page.  Thanks!
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Simpits-tech mailing list
> Simpits-tech at simpits.org
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/simpits-tech
> To unsubscribe, please see the instructions at the bottom of the above page.  Thanks!
>