[simpits-tech] VB Code to strip digits apart

Erwin Neyt simpits-tech@simpits.org
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:33:27 +0100


Good I was off-line last night, otherwise I would have stepped in big time
:)

Delphi is a good choise, has a huge community (www.torry.ru) and is one of
the better RAD tools at the moment (a lot better than MSVC6 and MSVB6). 
Delphi is almost as OOP as C++ (will take you years to find the diffences),
and I find my understanding of ObjectPascal greatly aided in learning C++.

If you want to do low-level Windows stuff (like device drivers) you're
better of with MSVC6, but for 'normal' application development, in my
opinion, the VCL beats MFC on all aspects.

BTW. F4 Glass and F4 Data Mirror are both build in Delphi.

Good choice,

Erwin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Fagner [mailto:crease-guard@attbi.com] 
> Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 4:57
> To: simpits-tech@simpits.org
> Subject: RE: [simpits-tech] VB Code to strip digits apart
> 
> 
> Delphi it is then.
> 
> Jay
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: simpits-tech-admin@simpits.org 
> [mailto:simpits-tech-admin@simpits.org]
> On Behalf Of Gene 
> Buckle
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:53 PM
> To: simpits-tech@simpits.org
> Subject: RE: [simpits-tech] VB Code to strip digits apart
> 
> 
> > Cost aside, of VB6 and Delphi, which would be quickest for me to 
> > learn?
> >
> 
> As much as I hate to say it, VB6 is the simpler of the two.  
> I *strongly* suggest Delphi though. :)  I've got Phidget code 
> for Delphi working quite well now. *Huge Grin*
> 
> g.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simpits-tech mailing list
> Simpits-tech@simpits.org 
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/simpit> s-tech
> To 
> unsubscribe, please see the instructions at the 
> bottom of the above page. Thanks!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simpits-tech mailing list
> Simpits-tech@simpits.org 
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/simpit> s-tech
> To 
> unsubscribe, please see the instructions at the 
> bottom of the above page.  Thanks!
>