[GEM Development] version of opengem for easy use for windows users

[Lyrical Nanoha]

On Fri, 12 May 2006, Liam Proven wrote:

> Not impressed at /all./ I'd go with DR-DOS like a shot myself. Also open, 
> also GPL, current and supported and being actively developed.

o.o?  To my knowledge it's not open, although an older version of the 
kernel is source-available.

> The DOS shell is more familiar if you come from a PC-ish background, 
> certainly, but the Linux shell is so much more powerful that frankly there is 
> just no comparison.

I'm trying to get a Bourne shell running on 16-bit DOS.

-uso.