<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>Jim,</P>
<P>as i had chance to tell you.... you can count on my interest in this.</P>
<P>Waiting for further details.</P>
<P>Davide</P>
<P> </P>
<P><BR><BR> </P>Jim </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: "Jim K." <JIMK@SISNA.COM>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: Simulator Cockpit tech list <SIMPITS-TECH@SIMPITS.ORG>
<DIV></DIV>>To: Simpits <SIMPITS-TECH@SIMPITS.ORG>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: [simpits-tech] RE: panels
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:36:04 -0700
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>> >>>>>Message: 2
<DIV></DIV>> > You also might want to ask him about QC failures. MILSPEC QC is
<DIV></DIV>>very stringent
<DIV></DIV>> > - especially for aviation type things - so they're bound to have
<DIV></DIV>>some that
<DIV></DIV>> > fail.
<DIV></DIV>> > Richard
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Mfg pass the mil spec QA requirements onto their supplier. Its a
<DIV></DIV>>mil spec/contract requirement to do so. I don't know if the panel
<DIV></DIV>>company actually buys the raw metal stock themselves and then does
<DIV></DIV>>the machine work in house or if they contract that out. If that
<DIV></DIV>>work is contracted out then whoever makes the parts has the mil QA
<DIV></DIV>>requirements. If the parts don't pass incoming QA at the panel
<DIV></DIV>>company those parts would go back to the supplier.
<DIV></DIV>>Jim
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>_______________________________________________
<DIV></DIV>>Simpits-tech mailing list
<DIV></DIV>>Simpits-tech@simpits.org
<DIV></DIV>>http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/simpits-tech
<DIV></DIV>>To unsubscribe, please see the instructions at the bottom of the
<DIV></DIV>>above page. Thanks!
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Personalizza MSN Messenger con sfondi e foto. <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMBITIT/2749??PS=">E' divertente!</a> </html>