[GEM Development] DR operating systems

[Thomas Clayton]

Michael:

AFAIK: GEM/4, GEM /5 are.
As long as it IS: DRi _and_ GEM, I believe  the answer _is_: yes.

As a counter-example: GST Publisher ?3 would NOT be under GNU Pub Lic even though (the GEM "run-time") _parts_ were derived from DRi GEM.
Same with Xerox Ventura Publisher "for DOS".
These are _not_ F, OS, Sw.

Thomas Clayton


--- On Fri, 12/3/10, M.Kasten <Dr.Kasten at t-online.de> wrote:

From: M.Kasten <Dr.Kasten at t-online.de>
Subject: [GEM Development] DR operating systems
To: gem-dev at simpits.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 4:29 PM
 
Dear members,

an ad[d]itional question: Falls GEM/4 and /5 also under the GPL ?

>From ebay i have owned a version of DRI Presentation Team 2.0 (including a full set of manuals). If not license restricted i can bring it up for a dow[n]load page.

Be[st] regards,

Michael Kasten

Dr.Kasten at t-online.de