[GEM Development] GEM not going forward... Comments?

[david johnson]

Hi Shane,

I think the status is both; I find the history related to Digital Research interesting.
The easiest starting point that I have found it to use the Pacific-C GEM bindings from John Elliott and the "text window" routine (tw.zip) from Heniz Rath -- http://www.geocities.com/heinz_rath/

David


--- On Wed, 12/31/08, Shane Gough <goughsw at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Shane Gough <goughsw at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GEM Development] GEM not going forward... Comments?
To: "GEM Development" <gem-dev at simpits.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 9:03 AM

Hi all,

I'm a new member so I'm still catching up on the changes (or lack of changes).

I've joined because I'm interested in porting some software to GEM, now I've got it to install under both FreeDOS and a MS-DOS installation I'm keen to do some more work.


At the moment I'm playing with TP 5.5 and TP 7 (using a set of disks I bought a long, long time ago). I'd like to play with C and C++ with OpenGEM but I don't have the information to work with those situations at the moment (google is helping though).


What is the status of GEM at the moment? I imagine for most people it would be a toy (or a visit to the past).

Cheers,
Shane


_______________________________________________
gem-dev mailing list
gem-dev at simpits.org
http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.simpits.org/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20081231/0c38f287/attachment.html