From topcatdrc at yahoo.com  Thu May 17 12:54:48 2007
From: topcatdrc at yahoo.com (Thomas Clayton)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
Message-ID: <356533.83859.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Dear Gene et Al.:

I seem to remember that, once upon a time, there were archives of our
correspondance available for download in (zip or tar or ?) format. When
I accessed my personal page - to see WHY I hadn't been receiving my
monthly notices of Id and PsWd - I also went looking about the website
for them (without success).

Sincerely,

Thomas Clayton



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 

From topcatdrc at yahoo.com  Thu May 17 13:48:16 2007
From: topcatdrc at yahoo.com (Thomas Clayton)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <356533.83859.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <954244.50653.qm@web33609.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Dear All:

I have just found them. Thinking that they might be at DeltaSoft NOT
simpits, I went 'poking' around there. (Not to worry. I was careful
which memory bits/bytes I peeked/poked so that NO crashes occurred. ;-)
 Lovely site, BTW. I hope there are backups!) I found a link BACK TO
simpits.org that got me to THE archive:

http://www.simpits.org/pipermail/gem-dev/

which is what I wanted to confirm the existance of.

(I just got hold of the Webmail extensions to Thunderbird for Yahoo!.
I'm using them with the Portable vn of Tb on a USB 'drive' at a local
pub. lib.. 
(BTW,
http://portableapps.com/
is where you can find the main programs.
http://webmail.mozdev.org/
is where the webmail extensions can be found.)

Anyway, I'm considering WHICH of my subscribed groups that I'm going to
download - well, get copies of their letters - onto my USB drive. IF
they're available in 'archives' already, then I'm thinking that I'd be
able to 'fetch them' at any time.

Sincerely,

Thomas Clayton



--- Thomas Clayton <topcatdrc at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Gene et Al.:
> 
> I seem to remember that, once upon a time, there were archives of our
> correspondance available for download in (zip or tar or ?) format.
> When
> I accessed my personal page - to see WHY I hadn't been receiving my
> monthly notices of Id and PsWd - I also went looking about the
> website
> for them (without success).
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Thomas Clayton
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 
> _______________________________________________
> gem-dev mailing list
> gem-dev at simpits.org
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather

From owen at owenrudge.net  Thu May 17 14:10:13 2007
From: owen at owenrudge.net (Owen Rudge)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:10:13 +0100
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
References: <954244.50653.qm@web33609.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <05cc01c798c7$c5dda6a0$6501a8c0@rudgexp>

Heh, that prompted me to read through a few things from the past seven 
years. Ah, memories. And slight embarrassment at times. :-P

-- 
Owen Rudge
http://www.owenrudge.net/ 


From topcatdrc at yahoo.com  Thu May 17 14:33:59 2007
From: topcatdrc at yahoo.com (Thomas Clayton)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <05cc01c798c7$c5dda6a0$6501a8c0@rudgexp>
Message-ID: <959319.71039.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Dear Owen:

--- Owen Rudge <owen at owenrudge.net> wrote:

> Heh, that prompted me to read through a few things from the past
> seven 
> years. Ah, memories. And slight embarrassment at times. :-P
> 
That reminds me of what Prof. Ehrenfest said to his students, Goudsmit
and Uhlenbeck, when they came running in after their return from
visiting Prof. Lorentz. G & U asked that E. NOT send their joint paper
on electron spin to the publishers because L. had shown that IF their
hypoth. were correct than the 'surface' of the electron would be going
FASTER than the speed of light AND the magnetic moment would TWICE the
usually accepted value. E. said
'I've sent it away weeks ago and it will appear next week. Well, you
are both young and can afford a stupidity.'

BTW, The faster than light doesn't matter (there is NO surface!) and
g=2 IS correct (up to Relativistic Quantum Field Theoretical
corrections).

Sincerely,

Thomas Clayton

> -- 
> Owen Rudge
> http://www.owenrudge.net/ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gem-dev mailing list
> gem-dev at simpits.org
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 



From cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk  Thu May 17 15:18:28 2007
From: cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk (cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:18:28 +0100
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <959319.71039.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <05cc01c798c7$c5dda6a0$6501a8c0@rudgexp>
	<959319.71039.qm@web33615.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20070517221828.GB23424@mordred.midworld.co.uk>

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:33:59PM -0700, Thomas Clayton wrote:
> That reminds me of what Prof. Ehrenfest said to his students, Goudsmit
> and Uhlenbeck, when they came running in after their return from
> visiting Prof. Lorentz. G & U asked that E. NOT send their joint paper
> on electron spin to the publishers because L. had shown that IF their
> hypoth. were correct than the 'surface' of the electron would be going
> FASTER than the speed of light AND the magnetic moment would TWICE the
> usually accepted value. E. said
> 'I've sent it away weeks ago and it will appear next week. Well, you
> are both young and can afford a stupidity.'
> 
> BTW, The faster than light doesn't matter (there is NO surface!) and
> g=2 IS correct (up to Relativistic Quantum Field Theoretical
> corrections).

This is a very interesting email.  Thankyou very much. :-)

Rob

From topcatdrc at yahoo.com  Thu May 17 15:31:41 2007
From: topcatdrc at yahoo.com (Thomas Clayton)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <20070517221828.GB23424@mordred.midworld.co.uk>
Message-ID: <416536.99936.qm@web33603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Rob / cheesey,

I don't recognisze your name/ 'handle'. What is the rest of your name -
OR, better yet, your usual 'handle'(screen name)?

TomC

The term "handle" goes back to the days of Citizens' Band (CB) radio
and, after that, dial-in BBSes.

--- cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk wrote:

> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:33:59PM -0700, Thomas Clayton wrote:
> > That reminds me of what Prof. Ehrenfest said to his students,
> Goudsmit
> > and Uhlenbeck, when they came running in after their return from
> > visiting Prof. Lorentz. G & U asked that E. NOT send their joint
> paper
> > on electron spin to the publishers because L. had shown that IF
> their
> > hypoth. were correct than the 'surface' of the electron would be
> going
> > FASTER than the speed of light AND the magnetic moment would TWICE
> the
> > usually accepted value. E. said
> > 'I've sent it away weeks ago and it will appear next week. Well,
> you
> > are both young and can afford a stupidity.'
> > 
> > BTW, The faster than light doesn't matter (there is NO surface!)
> and
> > g=2 IS correct (up to Relativistic Quantum Field Theoretical
> > corrections).
> 
> This is a very interesting email.  Thank[]you very much. :-)
> 
> Rob



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097

From cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk  Thu May 17 16:12:31 2007
From: cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk (cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:12:31 +0100
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <416536.99936.qm@web33603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20070517221828.GB23424@mordred.midworld.co.uk>
	<416536.99936.qm@web33603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20070517231231.GC23424@mordred.midworld.co.uk>

I'm Rob Mitchelmore.  I've posted here on and off for years.  Just this mail client doesn't have my full name on it because I keep forgetting to edit my config file.

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:31:41PM -0700, Thomas Clayton wrote:
> Rob / cheesey,
> 
> I don't recognisze your name/ 'handle'. What is the rest of your name -
> OR, better yet, your usual 'handle'(screen name)?
> 
> TomC
> 
> The term "handle" goes back to the days of Citizens' Band (CB) radio
> and, after that, dial-in BBSes.
> 
> --- cheesey at mordred.midworld.co.uk wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:33:59PM -0700, Thomas Clayton wrote:
> > > That reminds me of what Prof. Ehrenfest said to his students,
> > Goudsmit
> > > and Uhlenbeck, when they came running in after their return from
> > > visiting Prof. Lorentz. G & U asked that E. NOT send their joint
> > paper
> > > on electron spin to the publishers because L. had shown that IF
> > their
> > > hypoth. were correct than the 'surface' of the electron would be
> > going
> > > FASTER than the speed of light AND the magnetic moment would TWICE
> > the
> > > usually accepted value. E. said
> > > 'I've sent it away weeks ago and it will appear next week. Well,
> > you
> > > are both young and can afford a stupidity.'
> > > 
> > > BTW, The faster than light doesn't matter (there is NO surface!)
> > and
> > > g=2 IS correct (up to Relativistic Quantum Field Theoretical
> > > corrections).
> > 
> > This is a very interesting email.  Thank[]you very much. :-)
> > 
> > Rob
> 
> 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Finding fabulous fares is fun.  
> Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
> _______________________________________________
> gem-dev mailing list
> gem-dev at simpits.org
> http://www.simpits.org/mailman/listinfo/gem-dev

From geneb at deltasoft.com  Thu May 17 21:07:03 2007
From: geneb at deltasoft.com (Gene Buckle)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GEM Development] Are There 'Archives' of Our Correspondance?
In-Reply-To: <356533.83859.qm@web33614.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0705172106410.38713-100000@grumble.deltasoft.com>

> I seem to remember that, once upon a time, there were archives of our
> correspondance available for download in (zip or tar or ?) format. When
> I accessed my personal page - to see WHY I hadn't been receiving my
> monthly notices of Id and PsWd - I also went looking about the website
> for them (without success).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Thomas Clayton
>

Here you go Thomas:

http://www.simpits.org/pipermail/gem-dev/

g.

-- 
"I'm not crazy, I'm plausibly off-nominal!"

Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.