[GEM Development] Re: gem-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 23

[Shane M. Coughlan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
John Elliott wrote:

> EMMA breaks (or tries to break) the 64k limit on the AES, not the
> Desktop; it does this by moving the Item Selector into EMS. If you
> want more than 64k of Desktop you just compile it in the large
> model. My Desktop hasn't reached that point yet, but it might.

Thanks for the clarification John.  Sorry for ASSE (Another Stupid
Shane Error).

I'd like to include EMMA in the next OpenGEM, but when I tried it on
my machine it froze on exiting.  I'll begin testing it again perhaps
tonight.

Regards

Shane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFDC+L2Ta6KuhPvdOoRAqn6AKCKnDX7/3d5Oob7pUYbwYI1k5rTygCffzC6
3eOgTE0uypsZpa4Q57PSgnA=
=xEhF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----